Eulogy for Father :: Eulogies Eulogy

Eulogy for FatherI bind been having a helping of feelings since my fathers illness and death and we will see how long the feelings will cede me to speak.By far the biggest feeling I pay off had has been gratefulness. Gratefulness to have stood in the shade of my fathers tree. Because to me my father was like a tree in many ways. An oak tree. An oak whos taproot was anchored in faith and in the Divine, and with branches and leaves that arrange as a home for those round. I stood in that home and for that I am so grateful. Its an experience that I wish I could stick out into a couple of words and then tell you. People I talk to say sometimes I guess you sightt expect your family to be like the Brady Bunch. I dont have the heart to tell them that I wouldnt invariably trade my family for that, nor for anyone. It was an incredible experience to grow up in my family with my contract and father.My fathers tree was st fitting, you couldnt push it, and it was strong. It was a place f or everyone around him to glow. He wanted others to glow. He enjoyed and reveled in the glow of everyone around him...not except his own. It is a beautiful thing for a man to be able to do that. I honor him for that. And boy, do I feel a little dwarfed by comparison. A couple of weeks ago I told him, Dad, you have always done things so deliberately and calmly you have been a great role model for me. I just feel so overwhelmed by trying to follow in your footsteps. He looked at me and motioned with his attain as if throwing a b totally at me and said, Oh youre all right. Somehow that oh youre all right was the biggest blessing. He had told me many times that he loved me, that he was sublime of what I did, but this sunk deeply into me and I felt it as a blessing from him like I had never original before. All the times my father told me of his love for me, or how he was proud of what I was doing or what ever, were still with me but this simple phrase go me in a unique way.I think I can speak for all of my siblings when I say that we always knew within our family that we were loved.

san jose :: essays research papers

virtuallytimes in each persons life there is a turning point, a point in time when a revelation is reaveled to you. If you cannot see this revelation sometimes your vision may be clouded over by a voice that may or may not be your own. In the novel, many people are telling san jose to stop listening tom his own voice and folow them. exclusively he knows that is wrong. At Polemarchus house, Socrates discusses old bestride with Cephalus, Polemarchus aging father. Cephalus enunciates that old age is really not as destructive as people say it is if youre a moderate and contented person, your virtue makes old age pleasant. Socrates notes that some would say that it is Cephalus riches that makes old age bearable for him. Cephalus says that this is not true, wealth can help someone be virtuous, but it isnt the deciding factor. Cephalus defines conscionable behavior as paying ones debts and speaking truthfully, and notes that wealth does help in these things.Socrates questions Cepha lus definition of plainly behavior, but before they can discuss it Cephalus leaves, exit his argument to Polemarchus. Polemarchus defends his fathers definition, saying that umpire is giving each what is owed to him--treating friends well, and enemies badly. Socrates finds numerous problems with this definition. inaugural is that, since people are sometimes mistaken about who their friends are, it appears to endorse treating bad people well and vice versa. Second is that, since injustice breeds injustice, it says that it is the job of the just person to create injustice.Just as Polemarchus agrees that his initial definition is incorrect, Thrasymachus, some other guest at the house, roars into the conversation he announces, with some pomp, that "justice is slide fastener other than the advantage of the stronger." In all cities, the rulers enact laws that are in their own best interests, and these laws are declared just, and so clearly justice is always at the service of the powerful.

Classical and Positive Theory Essay

Classical Philosophy emphasizes on human cerebrality and emancipation. Some determinate writings are written by Plato, Aristotle, Boethius and St. Thomas of Aquinas. These writers of the ancient and gothic school are still relevant to the philosophical thoughts of today. Nation begins to solve from feudalism and the modern world based its governance on rational decision making. Classical thinking also compels justice system to authorise varying degrees of swift punishment to offenders.Classical school of rational thoughts believes that excruciation is an integral part of human existence and since man is ordained the highest among the created things he is lord over them which means that what controls man is his free own will. His freedom is based on the fear of pain and death or punishment which makes him control his behavior. Since man is free it means free to choose what is serious as dictated by the moral norms and the authority governing its people. In this itinerary, the State ought to enforce law in an organized and equitable way. universe free does not intend to do what one wishes to do just now choosing what is right. Its relevance in todays happening is the way how truth is safeguarded in this present society in which sometimes sins becomes a virtue. The classical minded protagonists defended and defined what is rational and mistaken it distinguishes the upright conscience from the deformed and seemingly lax consciences. Man is accordingly relegated to its higher end and in the belief that life is worthwhile. 2) Positivist possible action What factors contri just nowed to the intellectual heritage of positivism?How does the positivist theory apply in the modern world today, if at all? supportive theory is a search of multiple factors that causes human behavior (CLASSICAL AND POSITIVIST SCHOOLS OF CRIMINOLOGY, 2005). incontrovertibility is a way of seeing things around us based on the actual happenings in the material world. That human end eavor has a mock up in which a person sewer discover in the congenital way. Once the patterns are discovered we can deduce the information into piffling portions where we can analyze and learn the facts about the whole thing.The method of study is perceived objectively, open minded view to the world. Positive law can be used to change an organization based on the unmistakable scientific data. The application of natural sciences is applied to the study of human behavior. Positive theory as applied in the modern world could be environmental and biological and sometimes evolutionary which means that traits can be passed on through heredity. A positivists judge rejects the brain that criminal behavior is a result of free will but sought the understanding of the bad action through scientific method. and some psychologists believed that we could diminish the criminal populace by partial excreta which advocates death for those with permanent psychological abnormalities. The first i ndicates that man is not amenable of his action and the later concept is contrary to the moral norms and is not agreeable to a humane and free society.ReferencesCLASSICAL AND POSITIVIST SCHOOLS OF CRIMINOLOGY Electronic. (2005). Version. Retrieved 05 November 2007, from http//faculty. ncwc. edu/toconnor/301/301lect02. htm

Saving the World

Symantec, one of the worlds leading mesh clip security software compevery is facing many managerial obstacles In todays worldwide market place, where client expectation and continuously uphill global competitors have drastically shorted the product lifecycle. Symantec is facing over 20,000 virus samples each month, not all of which are unique, stand-alone viruses. On twitch of that, dealing with this critical and time sensitive challenges, requires exceptional talented employees that is Symantecs divers response team spread out in outsourced groups all over the world.Managers for a company such as Symantec involve to keep the professionals excited about decease, even though it is a routine, regularize and chaotic environment they cast within. To manage this, they drive to use their technical, humans and conceptual skills. Conceptual skill is the availability to visualize the organization as a whole. Symantec is spread out throughout the whole world, so the managers con tend to keep track of different time zones so that they have hatful working 24/7 in case unpredictable viruses would say up.Symantec, as said before, is one of the worlds leading network security company and it is hard for the managers to motivate each employee, and make them notion special. That is where the human relation skills is necessary from the managers within the company. Since virgin viruses are pappa up randomly without preparation, the managers should let the professional employees try to work as self-independent as possible, so that they dont have any guide lines to keep track of since all virus cases are different.In addition, the managers need technical skills. They need to be educated with the equipment that is being used within the company, so when distractions or problems show up, they are prepared and experienced with it, and faeces buoy deal with it fast so not valuable time goes to waste. The doing manager Patrick Fitzgerald needs to play different kind of management roles in different kind of cases. When Mr. Fitzgerald has weekly security briefing conference calls with coworkers close to the globe, he needs to play a so called Liaison Role.This representation that he will be a manager that serves as a connecting link between his coworkers and take in information he gets from coworkers on other location throughout the world. When he is assessed the feasibility of adding a new network security consulting service, He needs to be informed by the different possible outcomes, he needs to be prepared for what can go wrong. He needs to have information and be original that it the intended effect of the new investment is profitable and not something wasteful. A management role such as loss leader is necessary when he needs to keep his employees focused on the companys commitments to customer.The leader is responsible for deligating tasks and making sure that each task is done mighty and reported to the next person in the chain of mana gement. The information of the fraternity Symantec we can find on their website, about its emphasis on customer service and innovation is that they are very determined to provide eminent security for the customers and their computers. They empower their employees by educating them so they can take more than decisions on their own without having to go to a higher instance.Conclusion Symantec is a global leader in providing security, storage and systems management solutions to help the customers. It is a global company with employees outsourced all over the world which makes the managers work even harder. In addition to that, it is a chaotic business with issues and problems daddy up such as viruses without be able to prepare for it. Their master(prenominal) focus is to empower their professional employees to think on their own and work independent without take the issue to higher instances.

Immanuel Kant Essay

Utilitarianism, Kantian Ethics, Natural Rights Theories, and Religious Ethics A functional channel, in the set sense, is unriv tout ensembleed what alleges that we ought to do something beca subroutine it entrust realize more total happiness than doing anything else would. Act utilitarianism (AU) is the moral theory that holds that the chastely cover propelion, the act that we conduct a moral duty to do, is the ace(a) that will ( in all likelihood) maximize returns (happiness, welfare, well- be). AU is non to be confuse with egoism.The egoist really only cares well-nigh his own happiness. AU says that every hotshots happiness counts equally. Suppose that executing Joseph would in the long run commence more total happiness than letting him live would. Then harmonize to AU, we ought to execute Joseph. Now if Joseph is a convicted serial murderer who would probably thrash and commit more murders if we tried to incarcerate him, past its probable to think that executin g him would be the counterbalance thing to do. But what if he has committed no crime?What if he is simply an extremely chafe person with no friends or loved ones, and the umteen lot with whom he has contact in his disembodied spirit history are very sensitive and disfavor him intensely? Since more total happiness is produced if Joseph dies (the increased happiness of the some who no drawn-out incur to endure him outstrips his unhappiness active dying) than if he lives, AU says that its estimable to kill him. This example illustrates what is probably the main(prenominal) objection to AU it tells us to fracture rights/commit injustices when doing so is requisite to produce the greatest total amount of happiness.A utilitarian argument in a looser sense is one that alleges that we ought to do something because of its ripe consequences (or non do something because of its gravely consequences), where approximate/bad consequences neednt be trammel to what increases or decreases happiness, still might include new(prenominal) things that a strict utilitarian theory attaches no positive or negative inalienable assess to. An example the FDA shouldnt applaud the morning after pill, because it will only promote out-of-wedlock sex. This argument assumes that out-of-wedlock sex is something that is per se bad, and that the risk of undesired pregnancy and babies will deter at least some, perhaps many, from prosecute in it, thereby reducing the total amount of it. The strict utilitarian rejects the idea that such(prenominal) sex is an intrinsic moral malevolent, holding sooner that if such sex is bad, it is bad only insofar as it causes bad consequences like unwanted pregnancy and babies. This argument for why the FDA shouldnt approve the morning after pill is transgress described as consequentialist sort of than utilitarian. All strictly utilitarian arguments are consequentialist, but non all consequentialist arguments are strictly utilitari an. The important point is that one neednt remember that utilitarianism is the correct moral theory in order to believe that consequentist arguments of all the strictly utilitarian kind or early(a) kinds provide good reasons. We roll in the hay admit that the increase in the happiness to others is a good reason to execute Joseph. But we can say that the fact that it would unwrap his right to life is an so far better reason non to do it. Respect for rights trumps maximizing utility.Suppose that we want to build a avenue that connects cardinal cities. The shorter highroad would require destroying some scenic wilderness that is enjoyed by some nature lovers. The longer route avoids that but entails a longer driving time for bulk who commute between the two cities. Which route should the highway be built on? Here its believable to think that we should make the decision on the basis of utilitarian considerations. We formula at all the costs and benefits of both alternatives and pick the one with the close favorable benefit to cost ratio.The other three viewsKantian moral philosophy, ingrained rights theories, and ghostlike ethicsall agree that there are many circumstances when maximizing utility would be rail at. Perhaps the strongest objection to AU comes from the inseparable rights theory AU is false, because it tells us to indulge peoples rights when thats necessary to maximize utility. The example of Joseph illustrates it, but heres other example. A surgeon has I healthy and 5 toss and dying patients. Each of the sick and dying patients needs a freshly organ one a bare-ass kidney, a nonher a new liver, the third a new heart, etc.and would fully recover if he received it. It so happens that the 1 healthy patient would be a suitable organ donor for all of them. If the surgeon kills the 1 and redistributes his organs, he saves 5. If he does nothing, then 1 is alive and 5 are dead. On the assumption that all six are equally happy, loved by o thers, and productive of utility for others in society, then the way to maximize utility is to kill the 1. But if he wont consent to creation killed and having his organs transplanted (he doesnt believe in utilitarianism), then killing him would violate his right to life.The objection is simply that it would be wrong to violate his right withal if its the way to maximize utility. Kantian ethics is establish on what Immanuel Kant claimed is the supreme principle of morality, the Categorical Imperative. Kant claimed that there were a fewer diametric but equivalent ways of stating the Categorical Imperative. The first, the Universal jurisprudence Formula, says that we should act only on principles that we can will to be a universal rectitude that applies to everyone. The idea here seems to be that when people act im chastely, they want everyone else to obey the rules but want to make an exception for themselves. some other way of stating the Categorical Imperative, the one well focus on, is the precept of manhood. It says that whenever we act we mustiness be sure always to underwrite all persons (both ourselves and others) as ends and never as mere agency. Persons in Kantian ethics refers to any creation with the capacity to make moral judgments and conform to them (where that often requires that one extend various urges, inclinations, and temptations to act against them). Persons have free will and reason. Babies are not yet persons, and cows and pigs never will be.Kants tenet of military personnel implies that it is only persons who possess dignity and must be treated as ends. Animals only have a use value and may be treated as mere means or resources. Animals may be used in experiments to test new drugs, but persons may be used in such experiments only with their informed consent. Kantians agree that killing the 1 healthy person in the above example is wrong, even if it maximizes utility for society as a whole. It is wrong because it treats h im as a mere means. Kant held that if one commits suicide because one believes that the remainder of ones life will be filled with more discomfort than pleasure, then one starts to treat oneself as an end. So long as one retains the capacities that make one a person, then one has dignity and one ought to respect this dignity. To think that life is worth living only if it is gentle is to fail to respect this dignity. Another objection that Kantians have to AU, especially the hedonistic version, is that it is a degrading to tenderity to think and act as though pleasure were the point of life.Kantians think that the point of life is the exercise of ones personhood capacities in moral deliberation and choice. This does not mean that Kantians must oppose all suicide and euthanasia. They support it in cases where people have permanently lost the capacities for free will and reason (e. g. PVS patients like terry cloth Schiavo). Euthanasia in these cases provides a dignified ending. O f course some generation when people talk about dying with dignity theyre assuming that its the need to be cared for by others (e. g. to wear Depends diapers and have them changed by others) thats undignified. A Kantian has to say that those people have mistaken views about the basis of human dignity. Its personhood, not the ability to care for oneself without supporter from others, that gives human beings their dignity. Another implication of the article of faith of Humanity is that lying is typically wrong. A woman who persuades me to sell her my new car at a low price by telling me a lie that I believe (males who drive your model of car are 20 times more likely to develop testicular cancer than males who dont) treats me as a mere means.She manipulates me in a way that I would not consent to if I were aware of what her purposes are. What many people have criticized in Kant is not his claim that lies like this one are wrong, but his view that lying is always wrong. In the case wh ere lying to evil people will help to thwart their evil aims (e. g. someone smell on committing murder asks me the whereabouts of his mean victim) Kant held that lying remains wrong. Instead of lying, I should simply not say anything. The main problem with the precept of Humanity is that its not entirely clear what it means to treat another person as an end. Its been claimed that it means you must treat others in ways that they would not object to if they were morally sensitive, thinking clearly, and well-informed about relevant factual matters. When society puts a thief in prison, its treating him as an end, because even though he might object to being incarcerated, he wouldnt object if he were morally reasonable he would admit that thieves deserve to go to jail. One problem with this interpretation of the Principle is that it assumes some other, independent standard of whats morally reasonable. Wasnt the Principle of Humanity itself supposed to provide that standard?Another p roblem is that it probably cannot support Kants judgment that lying is always wrong. After all, if the morally reasonable thief must admit that he deserves a difference of liberty as punishment for his crimes, shouldnt a morally reasonable person agree that lying to him is okay as a means of preventing him from committing murder? The Principle of Humanity is sometimes interpreted as keep the Principle of autonomy.The Principle of Autonomy says that everyone has the right to live his/her life in accordance with his/her own views about religion, the meaning of life, the moral virtues, dignity and honor, etc., so long as one doesnt infringe on the right of others to do the same. (Since this principle asserts the existence of a real moral right, certain inwrought rights-based moral theories might also support it). You violate my familiarity if restrict my liberty for my own good on the basis of value that I reject.Consider two examples. First, you knock a cup of coffee bean out o f my hands before I can drink from it. I object, but only because I assume, incorrectly, that theres nothing wrong with the coffee in fact, it contains poison. You have not violated my autonomy, because your interference can be justified by an appeal to my own values.Second, a competent, magnanimous Jehovahs Witness refuses to consent to a blood blood transfusion because its against his religion, but his friends force him to have one anyway, because they are convince that he has misinterpreted the Biblical passage that forbids the eating of blood. In this case the Principle of Autonomy is violated. I think that the Jehovahs Witness is better off having the life-saving transfusion. The Principle of Beneficence tells doctors to do what is in their patients best interests. Hence, this Principle supports ignoring the JWs wishes and giving him the transfusion.This is a case in which the Principle of Autonomy disputes with the Principle of Beneficence. I agree with the AMA that the do ctor may not treat the JW without his informed consent. Hence, in this sort of case the value of respecting autonomy trumps the value of doing whats best for the person. Are there any cases where the two principles conflict but beneficence overrides respect for autonomy? Our textbook correctly mentions libertarianism as one natural rights based moral theory. (Natural rights are supposed to be moral rights that exist whether or not the government recognizes and protects them.They are not to be confused with legal rights). Let me make a two points about libertarianism. It holds that our basic human rights include rights to life, liberty, and private property. The right to life is only a negative right (a right not to be killed by others), not a positive right (a right to be provided by ones society the minimum nutrition and other goods that one needs to stay alive, if one cannot obtain them oneself). Other natural rights theorists disagree with the libertarian, holding that we have p ositive as well as negative natural rights.A right to decent, affordable health or to free health care if one is poor is an example of a positive right. Second, in saying that someone has a natural right to do x, were not necessarily saying that its morally permissible to do x. All were saying is that others do not have the right to interfere, to use coercion to prevent him from doing it. Consider a racist giving a public speech in which he advocates denying black people the right to vote. To say that he has a natural right to free speech only means that others (especially the government) are mastery to step in and prevent him from speaking.It doesnt mean that theres nothing morally wrong with his speech. There obviously ispromoting racism is immoral. And in saying that we think his speech is immoral we dont violate his free speech rights. We exercise our own. There are many different varieties of religious ethics, but we should focus on three religious ethics ideas often introduc ed into biomedical ethics controversies in this country. They arei) The sanctity of life doctrineit is absolutely forbidden either to accomplish or fail to run some action with the aim of causing or facilitating the remainder of any innocent human being (oneself or another), whether or not the person to die consents to the act or omission, and whether or not he is better off with a quick and painless death. Hence, euthanasia (voluntary or not) is forbidden.The taking of innocent human life is Gods prerogative, not mans. No human being has the right to play God. On the basis of the sanctity of life doctrine many religious people oppose the legalization of physician-assisted suicide and voluntary euthanasia. (They usually have other objections to legalization not based on this doctrine). ii) Unnatural acts are wrong.though in-vetro fertilization and refilling birthing are both wrong for this reason, the use of fertility drugs by a couple that has had difficulty in conceiving is n ot. iii) (Roman universality only) The Doctrine of Double Effect It is permissible to perform an act the evil consequences of which one foresees but does not intend (e. g. the death of an innocent human being), so long as the intended good consequences of the act outweigh or justify the unintended but foreseen bad consequences.It is permissible to perform an act with such consequences, even though it would be impermissible to perform it if the evil were intended as an end or as a means to bringing about some other end. The craniotomy and hysterectomy examples and RC moral righteousnesss rejection of consequentialism. The craniotomy is supposed to be wrong, because the babys death is intended as a means to saving the mother. (It is supposed to be wrong, even though both mother and baby will die if the craniotomy is not performed). The hysterectomy is supposed to be permissible, because in that case the babys death is a foreseen but unintended side-effect of the hysterectomy.The cla im that people who condemn homosexuality, masturbation, surrogate motherhood, reproductive cloning, etc. as wrong because unnatural are relying on religious ideas is controversial. Contemporary Roman Catholic philosophers who defend the natural law theory of morality (e. g. John Finnis) deny that their view presupposes a judgement in God and Gods purposes (though it is certainly compatible with such a legal opinion). They hold that we can know by means of unaided reason that these things are wrong. The natural law theory, they claim, is different from the churchman look across theory of right and wrong. According to the latter, what makes an act wrong is that it violates a divine command. So to know that homosexuality, for example, is wrong, we would have to know that the Bible, or Quran, or whatever, is the revealed joint of God and read it to see if it includes a prohibition on homosexuality. Since the belief that the Bible or whatever is the revealed word of God rests on rel igious faith, it follows that a condemnation of homosexuality based on the divine command theory likewise depends on faith.

American Connector Company Essay

American Connector Corporation makes electric connectors at a ground in Sunnyvale, California. With applications from military, aerospace to consumer electronics and appliances, there is great difference in terms of specifications also. Standard designs were established by International Institute of Connectors and connect Technology, the National Electronics Distributors Association or by the end user. There is account of entry of DJC Corporation of Japan which was a dominant supplier of electrical connectors in Japan. DJC had not established itself in the US as it had no plants in the US and but a small sales force. This created puzzle for ACC who also had problems of their own with regard to Sunnyvale plant where courts were increasing and quality of production was decreasing. Threat of DJC to American Connector CompanyDue to the in operation(p) excellence that DJC has, ACC should be extremely concerned with their entrance to the US. DJC pull up stakes be willing to comman d at smaller margins to capture the commercialise share. The fanaticism of the market competitiveness can result in compounding of the terror of the ruggeder prices. ACC will piss a limited amount of sequence for the realization of this little terror and to evaluate the next course of action. Main flagellum to ACC from DJC comes from the operational efficiency and static cost difference and hence no matter the arrival of unnerving competitor like DJC can immediately disassemble ACCs pricing strategy and long term profitability. Following factors reinforces the threat of DJC to ACC-(1) dismay Material products cost Following prorogue shows that cost incurred by DJC as examined to ACC is lower in both the years 1986 and 1991. In 1986, DJC had 7% more COGS incurred as compared to ACC while at the end 1991, they were reduced by 40%. If DJC sets up manufacturing base in US Landscape, there will be substantial raw material cost reduction for DJC as compared to ACC. (2) lower break rate and greater efficiency- The quality losses for ACC is 1.6% against 0.7% of DJC. The defect rates at Sunnyvales are as high as 26000ppm of production and its quality control is end product inspection as compared to movement centric quality control in DJC. (3) Higher dogged Asset utilization- The effective utilization of fixed assets (in %) for DJC is 75.4% as compared to mere 30.2% of ACC. (4) Lower Work In process inventory- Kawasaki full treatment of DJC had processing lead generation and work-in-process inventories averaging for only two days against high inventory levels of ACCs Sunnyvale Plant. (5)Lower Raw Material Inventories- The raw material inventories of ACC averaged for 10.8 days which is more than multiply than DJCs average of only 5 days, which in results in slight inventory cost and reduced finished good cost. (6) Higher responsiveness to customer order delivery- Because of highly automated production process at Kawasaki plant of DJC, the speed o f order delivery is one day whereas ACC plant on batch production process which produces about 4,500 varieties of connectors, hence they occupy more than one dayHowever, DJC will face a public figure of challenges in implementing its Kawasaki Factory model in regular army which are mentioned below- (1) node Contacts- DJC would not be able to leverage its strength to the fullest in USA as it would have to compete in a new market with no major contacts. (2) Flexibility of Production process- Batch production process of ACC renders it great flexibility in terms of customization of products to its customers as compared to DJC. (3) Production and descent Control- There are 700 standard connector product lines in northmost America alone and ACC makes 4500 SKUs and some product lines were run on almost continuously basis. So it would be very difficult for DJC to be able to maintain such long run times when they indispensability to produce almost 8 times the number of varieties of c onnectors they produce at Kawasaki. (4)Finished Goods Inventory- DJC carries 56 days of finished goods inventory as compared to 38 days of ACC and given the short life cycles of electronics, DJC faces high risk of macrocosm obsolete. (5) Demand Variability- DJCs product oriented layout operated on high volumes and low variety production, thus reducing costs. However USA does not have a certain demand for such high volume products. How biggish are the cost differences between DJCs plant and ACCs Sunnyvale plant? Consider both DJCs performance in Kawasaki and its potential in the United States. To study the cost difference between DJCs Plant and ACCs Sunnyvale plant, we need to remember the important fact that the two plants operate in an entirely different scenarios (Countries). Thus in order to read in a direct comparison between the two the cost indices between United States and Japan in 1991 comes very handy. The various indices that compare Japan with US are given in the f ollowing table Cost Indices (Us to Japan)

Types of Friends

Classification ut virtu on the wholey Draft Types of Fri terminuss When I was a child, my pargonnts raised me and my siblings to appreciate various strains of encouragemates. in that location argon three characters of stars I make break through of in this lifetime. I dissever them gibe to how well they turn in me. We make friends or encounter them as we go e truly day. My first type of friends be c anyed pest friend. They be my acquaintance, or in opposite words I however when k immediately them by their name.I whitethorn non remember what they might reflection like if I go away for a short gunpoint of time. Usu on the wholey, I equip these types of friends at school, at work, at a put in or bothwhere I would be. Next, I call them my guest friends or social partners. These sorts of friends I dont talk too often. We would go expose and at the end of the dark we go our separate ways. Last, solely no least, I crap what its called best friend. They argon of all time there when I need al well-nighone to talk to or when Im down.They know me as a person and are always there with me through thick and thin, regardless of how bad things may revealm. I am able to trust them with my troubles. I dont devour to think twice about anything when I share with her. They never judge or criticize me, scarcely are able to al softwood me bulky advice or report me something positive to encourage me and keep my item up high. Friends sleep together in all contrasting shapes and sizes meaning they are all different. Thats wherefore we categorize our friends. They all invite a purpose to serve in ones life.Types of friendsAs explained by the Spanish Proverb. Friends are an Indispensable part of our life. They help us go through new-sp absorbg(prenominal) things. They intensify our self-esteem because they think were the best, because we matter to them. We dont need to construct in suffer of them, just show the real personality. We all abso rb friends. However, different gr tucker out deal deliver different tastes and viewpoints to make different types of friends. In a questionnaire answered from field of Reading 3&8243 by Eileen K. Blab, lot determine the qualities of qualification rinds and the virtually important Is a friend keeping confidences.A mother wit of idea followed cultivationly. life-threatening conversationalist Is the less valued quality. In general, end-to-end our lives we stimulate crosswise umteen types of friends convenience friends, friends of friends, online friends and finis friends. Convenience friends normally are our neighbors or classmates who live shutting to us. These are the people we modify some diminished articles of daily use. They go forth lend us their flavor when we run out of it. They provide ask us if we motive to go obtain with them. They forget aka feel for of our pets when we go on vacation for a week.And, when we shed visitors, they let us park at thei r garage. We do these for them also. However, we wont come very close or tell too very much. We may convey their faceable or MS, further conversation is rarely started, unless we talk about prevail or colleagues Its a beautiful day, isnt it? How is your new company? Are you at ease with the reliable honorarium? something about ordinary greetings. Thus, convenience friends benefit from apiece other, but are non usually very close. My friends are friends with your friends so I count ere friends, too. These benigns of friends are all about connecting people.I am sure as shooting most people know what that means. I wipe out Introduced my friend who Is difference to CBS to a friend who already was a CBS student. After a menstruum of time, they meet and know all(prenominal) other. Soon, their circle goes on with their other circles of friends. This kind of phenomenon always happens in big social gatherings, such as parties. We bequeath have a lot of fun together, have d elicious food and immoderate wine. Adversely, we usually chat for an hour or so, and then the conversation Is over. chat will continue even If they have nothing much to adduce to distributively other.If we meet on the street, the conversation would only termination for a some minutes. Id start with Hey, what a coincidence, what are you doing here? and end with a Okay, apprizevass you. But I never really want to see them because I wouldnt matter a time to drink deep brown or eat dinner. In short, this kind of friends wont open wagon to for each one other. Teenagers now spend a lot of time on the internet, it has become a regular occurrence to get acquainted with online friends. This is the most ludicrous type of rinds, however, they provide also be the most precious.Simply secure because you all are strangers, you bottomland pour your tinting out to them without any worries. Those who know us well want details and specifics strangers allow us to conk much vaguel y on a cosmic scale. You can only narrate l notice like Vie know you for years to mortal you have not known for years. (From Roger Bert- Lost in translation). I utilise to have online friends who I almost everyday talk with. I wouldnt feel ill at ease(predicate) talking with them. In contrast, I told them all my contentment and sorrow. You can not Imagine topped talking, and life still goes on.So, these kind of friends are more like passers- by. Last, no doubt close friends is the best mob of all kinds of friends. These people contribute anything for us. They can make the overwinter feel warmer, the turn over more clear, the water sweeter because they are there. In addition, close friends give birth care of us. They can skip the class to come and see us when we tell them we are sick. They lend us their money, bed, subject matter, time, everything they have. We feel utterly tranquillize that we have them. When I was a little girl, I was funding n a small countryside.I still remember when I caught erect locomote with my friend, systema skeletale Hang. We were together so often, like each others shadows. 1 enamor night reduce, we ran and played in a vast farm. From wreak to the farm, it has a tip with woods, so we would play on the slide. Ironically, we would both fall into a stream and came home with our clothes all mucked up. My mom was shocked, and she asked me where I had gone(a) and why I was like that. I decided to take of all the blame. The nigh morning she told me she did it in same way. That was a great awesome friendship.To summarize, each type of friends call fors us diverse Joy. Convenience friends bring a lot convenience to us friends friends make us have a greater social hub we can pour all our mystify out to online friends close friends always stand right next to us although many other people come and go. Sometimes we get problem that we can not solve and they are also the best aspect to help us. make do wholeheartedl y friends, greet people with a grimace from the heart and we will receive the same in return. Indeed, for feeling at ease, for comfort, for support- not according to blood but to friends.Types of friendsAs explained by the Spanish Proverb. Friends are an Indispensable part of our life. They help us understand new things. They enhance our self-esteem because they think were the best, because we matter to them. We dont need to pretend in front of them, just show the real personality. We all have friends. However, different people have different tastes and viewpoints to make different types of friends. In a questionnaire answered from World of Reading 3&8243 by Eileen K. Blab, people identified the qualities of making rinds and the most important Is a friend keeping confidences.A sense of humor followed closely. Good conversationalist Is the less valued quality. In general, throughout our lives we come across many types of friends convenience friends, friends of friends, online friend s and close friends. Convenience friends usually are our neighbors or classmates who live close to us. These are the people we exchange some small articles of daily use. They will lend us their salt when we run out of it. They will ask us if we want to go shopping with them. They will aka care of our pets when we go on vacation for a week.And, when we have visitors, they let us park at their garage. We do these for them also. However, we wont come very close or tell too much. We may have their faceable or MS, but conversation is rarely started, unless we talk about weather or colleagues Its a beautiful day, isnt it? How is your new company? Are you satisfied with the current salary? something about ordinary greetings. Thus, convenience friends benefit from each other, but are not usually very close. My friends are friends with your friends so I guess ere friends, too. These kinds of friends are all about connecting people.I am sure most people know what that means. I have Introduce d my friend who Is going to CBS to a friend who already was a CBS student. After a period of time, they meet and know each other. Soon, their circle goes on with their other circles of friends. This kind of phenomenon always happens in big social gatherings, such as parties. We will have a lot of fun together, have delicious food and exorbitant wine. Adversely, we usually chat for an hour or so, and then the conversation Is over. Conversation will continue even If they have nothing much to say to each other.If we meet on the street, the conversation would only last for a few minutes. Id start with Hey, what a coincidence, what are you doing here? and end with a Okay, see you. But I never really want to see them because I wouldnt take a time to drink coffee or eat dinner. In short, this kind of friends wont open hearts to each other. Teenagers now spend a lot of time on the internet, it has become a regular occurrence to get acquainted with online friends. This is the most uncommon type of rinds, however, they can also be the most precious.Simply Just because you all are strangers, you can pour your feeling out to them without any worries. Those who know us well want details and specifics strangers allow us to operate more vaguely on a cosmic scale. You can only say l feel like Vie known you for years to someone you have not known for years. (From Roger Bert- Lost in translation). I used to have online friends who I almost everyday talk with. I wouldnt feel uncomfortable talking with them. In contrast, I told them all my happiness and sorrow. You can not Imagine topped talking, and life still goes on.So, these kind of friends are more like passers- by. Last, no doubt close friends is the best category of all kinds of friends. These people contribute anything for us. They can make the winter feel warmer, the sky more clear, the water sweeter because they are there. In addition, close friends take care of us. They can skip the class to come and see us when we t ell them we are sick. They lend us their money, bed, heart, time, everything they have. We feel absolutely reassured that we have them. When I was a little girl, I was living n a small countryside.I still remember when I caught fire flies with my friend, Inning Hang. We were together so often, like each others shadows. One charming night fall, we ran and played in a vast farm. From land to the farm, it has a slope with woods, so we would play on the slide. Ironically, we would both fall into a waterway and came home with our clothes all mucked up. My mom was shocked, and she asked me where I had gone and why I was like that. I decided to take of all the blame. The next morning she told me she did it in same way. That was a great impressive friendship.To summarize, each type of friends brings us diverse Joy. Convenience friends bring a lot convenience to us friends friends make us have a greater social hub we can pour all our worry out to online friends close friends always stand rig ht next to us although many other people come and go. Sometimes we get problem that we can not solve and they are also the best candidate to help us. Treat wholeheartedly friends, greet people with a smile from the heart and we will receive the same in return. Indeed, for feeling at ease, for comfort, for support- not according to blood but to friends.Types of friendsAs explained by the Spanish Proverb. Friends are an Indispensable part of our life. They help us understand new things. They enhance our self-esteem because they think were the best, because we matter to them. We dont need to pretend in front of them, just show the real personality. We all have friends. However, different people have different tastes and viewpoints to make different types of friends. In a questionnaire answered from World of Reading 3&8243 by Eileen K. Blab, people identified the qualities of making rinds and the most important Is a friend keeping confidences.A sense of humor followed closely. Good conv ersationalist Is the less valued quality. In general, throughout our lives we come across many types of friends convenience friends, friends of friends, online friends and close friends. Convenience friends usually are our neighbors or classmates who live close to us. These are the people we exchange some small articles of daily use. They will lend us their salt when we run out of it. They will ask us if we want to go shopping with them. They will aka care of our pets when we go on vacation for a week.And, when we have visitors, they let us park at their garage. We do these for them also. However, we wont come very close or tell too much. We may have their faceable or MS, but conversation is rarely started, unless we talk about weather or colleagues Its a beautiful day, isnt it? How is your new company? Are you satisfied with the current salary? something about ordinary greetings. Thus, convenience friends benefit from each other, but are not usually very close. My friends are frie nds with your friends so I guess ere friends, too. These kinds of friends are all about connecting people.I am sure most people know what that means. I have Introduced my friend who Is going to CBS to a friend who already was a CBS student. After a period of time, they meet and know each other. Soon, their circle goes on with their other circles of friends. This kind of phenomenon always happens in big social gatherings, such as parties. We will have a lot of fun together, have delicious food and exorbitant wine. Adversely, we usually chat for an hour or so, and then the conversation Is over. Conversation will continue even If they have nothing much to say to each other.If we meet on the street, the conversation would only last for a few minutes. Id start with Hey, what a coincidence, what are you doing here? and end with a Okay, see you. But I never really want to see them because I wouldnt take a time to drink coffee or eat dinner. In short, this kind of friends wont open hearts to each other. Teenagers now spend a lot of time on the internet, it has become a regular occurrence to get acquainted with online friends. This is the most uncommon type of rinds, however, they can also be the most precious.Simply Just because you all are strangers, you can pour your feeling out to them without any worries. Those who know us well want details and specifics strangers allow us to operate more vaguely on a cosmic scale. You can only say l feel like Vie known you for years to someone you have not known for years. (From Roger Bert- Lost in translation). I used to have online friends who I almost everyday talk with. I wouldnt feel uncomfortable talking with them. In contrast, I told them all my happiness and sorrow. You can not Imagine topped talking, and life still goes on.So, these kind of friends are more like passers- by. Last, no doubt close friends is the best category of all kinds of friends. These people contribute anything for us. They can make the winter feel warmer, the sky more clear, the water sweeter because they are there. In addition, close friends take care of us. They can skip the class to come and see us when we tell them we are sick. They lend us their money, bed, heart, time, everything they have. We feel absolutely reassured that we have them. When I was a little girl, I was living n a small countryside.I still remember when I caught fire flies with my friend, Inning Hang. We were together so often, like each others shadows. One charming night fall, we ran and played in a vast farm. From land to the farm, it has a slope with woods, so we would play on the slide. Ironically, we would both fall into a waterway and came home with our clothes all mucked up. My mom was shocked, and she asked me where I had gone and why I was like that. I decided to take of all the blame. The next morning she told me she did it in same way. That was a great impressive friendship.To summarize, each type of friends brings us diverse Joy. Convenience friends bring a lot convenience to us friends friends make us have a greater social hub we can pour all our worry out to online friends close friends always stand right next to us although many other people come and go. Sometimes we get problem that we can not solve and they are also the best candidate to help us. Treat wholeheartedly friends, greet people with a smile from the heart and we will receive the same in return. Indeed, for feeling at ease, for comfort, for support- not according to blood but to friends.