Philosophy Critical Thinking Scholarship Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Philosophy Critical Thinking - Scholarship Essay Example1 You left your sprightly at work. 21 To call home you would have to find a pay phone.22 There ar not every payphones around here.C Without a mobile phone you cannot call home from anywhere.The premises are convergent. In the first cause the movement is 1.1, 1.2 and 2 and in the second argument the movement is 1, 2.1 and 2.2. Both arguments have both premises. The first argument has devil parts of the first premises and the second argument has two parts in the second premises. Since the structure is different of the two premises, they are convergent on the same level. QUESTION 3 5 marks Standardize the target argument and counterargument in the following passage. Include any counterconsiderations and state whether any premises on the same level are linked or convergent. Supporters of the Atkins diet reason out that following a high protein, low carbohydrate diet such as the Atkins diet is the best way to fall away weight, since on that diet you lilt out carbohydrates and it is carbohydrates that are responsible for weight gain. Further evidence they give that the Atkins diet is the way to go is the large upshot of celebrities who follow it. But nutritionists reason that although the Atkins diet may show immediate results, it is not the best way to lose weight. It is not safe, since eating a weed of protein-rich foods can increase the endangerment of heart disease, and cutting out carbohydrates increases the risk of some forms of cancer. Also, people who lose weight gradually on more schematic weight-loss plans are more in all probability to keep the weight off in the long term. Argument (Atkins Diet)1 On that diet you cut out carbohydrates and it is carbohydrates that are responsible for weight gain.2 There is a large number of...The statement here is not trying to convince you rather it provides the logical reasoning behind the unhappiness.The premises are convergent. In the first argument th e movement is 1.1, 1.2 and 2 and in the second argument the movement is 1, 2.1 and 2.2. Both arguments have two premises. The first argument has two parts of the first premises and the second argument has two parts in the second premises. Since the structure is different of the two premises, they are convergent on the same level.Supporters of the Atkins diet argue that following a high protein, low carbohydrate diet such as the Atkins diet is the best way to lose weight, since on that diet you cut out carbohydrates and it is carbohydrates that are responsible for weight gain. Further evidence they give that the Atkins diet is the way to go is the large number of celebrities who follow it.But nutritionists argue that although the Atkins diet may show immediate results, it is not the best way to lose weight. It is not safe, since eating a lot of protein-rich foods can increase the risk of heart disease, and cutting out carbohydrates increases the risk of some forms of cancer. Also, pe ople who lose weight gradually on more conventional weight-loss plans are more likely to keep the weight off in the long term.The counterargument does not react directly to the one premise given.