Hitchens Rationality of Atheism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Hitchens Rationality of Atheism - Essay modellingAnd this puts the entire question of creation as proscribed by the religions a tall claim. Religion has been a major promoter of violence through out the world. Every one of the religions has fought their own crusades for their own unutterable places. How, he argues, is that there is difference between on location and the other on the surface of the hide out He cites numerous examples where this has happened all over the world in the score of religions, be it Catholics, Hindus, Muslims or Jews.Similarly, the sick of(p) faiths people have on the religions have led them to take to unwanted assumptions and blind faiths. He quotes Heinrich Heine, In dim ages people argon guided by religion, as in a pitch black night a blind military personnel is the best guide he grapples the roads and the paths better than a man who can see. When daylight comes, however, it is foolish to use blind old men for guides. Most of the religions, accordi ng to him, expect punishments for sexual expletives any person might involve in. If sex is abhorred why was it that God had to have it at all God who was the all powerful creator, could have easily redesigned the entire evolution if he did non want human race to indulge in something like that. According to him, the creators of religions, man, have done it to their vantage and to subjugate half of the human population to their control. And most of the monotheistic religions, preach that human beings are sinners and that they impoverishment to supplicate to God every day as under a monarch. Faiths in religion, religious dogmas and in astrology are all badly placed. Aristotle pointed out that twins do not have the corresponding future whereas as per astrology they should be having almost similar future. All these melodic lines are presented by the indite in support of atheism.Section 2 Critique of Hitchens God is not Great.Your perception and evaluation of Hitchens argument seems to be on the wrong premise. Hitchen declares himself as anti-theist and not atheist to start with. Though the title negotiation of God, in his book he is not presenting himself as a person anti to God. Therefore, we need not look for evidence in the book for arguments anti to God. As an anti-theism person, he is opposing the practices of theism as we know it. Theism and the dogmas of theism are laid down millenniums back and to say that they fit into the current situation does not survive to the scientific thinking. I think the litmus test has been wrongly applied and the perception of the author has not been taken into consideration.Applying the rule 1, denial of what is known is irrational, we could easily see and the author establishes starting from a reduce of scientific principles how the religious dogmas have criticized and crucified people who stood up with new ideas. Whether it is that earth goes round the sun or that witch craft does not exist, the principles of the reli gious theism did not allow reconsideration of their thoughts. It denied the known facts of the case. There are number of cases where Hitchen substantiates, theism has denied known scientific facts. Theism fails in the first test itself.Theism fails in the second test too. Whether it is the crusades or the creation of Israel at the end of the Second World War, theism has only created death and destruction in the name of religion. The belief in what is preached by theism has not led the people to rational living is what is the argument of