The Hamlet Paradigm Essay -- English Literature Essays

The small town ParadigmCentral Question of the Play How does an man-to-man contradict when he develops an fixation with destroying the powerful force ruling his country, yet risks experiencing psychological disaffection, occurring at multiple levels within himself, if he attempts to destroy that force? This is the rudimentary question that Shakespeargon explores in his play small town, which is a char dresser study of an individual harboring just such an obsession, entailing just such a risk. Introduction That settlement is obsessed with destroying the powerful force ruling his country (Claudius) is plainly lucid in the play. But while this obsession initiates Hamlets behavior, it is his extra realization, that he risks psychological estrangement occurring on multiple levels as a result of trying to carry out his obsession, that shapes his behavior into the form that the earshot sees, one that seems bizarre and incomprehensible. The Nature of Hamlets Obsession The reasons for Hamlets obsession with exacting revenge against Claudius are fairly straightforward. The mite of Hamlet Sr. informed Hamlet that Claudius killed Hamlet Sr. and and then usurped him from his throne. In doing so, he emasculated Hamlet by robbing him of his central consumption model of masculinity, namely his father. He overly committed the moral and semipolitical sin of regicide, and the familial sin of killing his brother and subsequently quiescence with his wife. Claudius also deprived Hamlet of his rightful kingship, since Hamlet was second in line after Hamlet Sr. In addition, Hamlet at present knows that his love of his mother is corrupted since she is affectionate towards his emasculating enemy. The Nature of Hamlets Risk of Psychological Estrangement In attempting to kill Claudius, Hamlet risks abide estrangement occurring within his self at multiple psychological levels. there are primarily five such levels of estrangement 1. Religious estrangement Hamlet feels se lf-actualized from following basic religious principles of living. This is shown by his lamentation that the fadeless had fixed his cannon against self-slaughter, thus preventing Hamlet from committing suicide at a time when he felt like doing so. If Hamlet were to kill Claudius, he would be violating a central religious principle against murdering another homophile being. This would make him feel guilt at having violat... ...esire to extract revenge against Claudius, is also actively looking for slipway to relieve himself of the psychological pain that harboring his obsession causes him, even if seeking psychological refuge in such ways might mean giving up on the movement altogether. 11) That Hamlets awareness, of the high risk of personal estrangement that he faces from his endeavor to extract revenge, is for him a source of great stress. 12) That the ignorance of his people of Claudius crime and their soreness at knowing it may cause them to commit the morally double-standa rd act of rejecting Hamlet and supporting Claudius. 13) That despite his fear of rejection by his countrymen, Hamlet palliate has the capacity to take out on them the anger he feels against them for potentially or actually committing this double-standard act. Virtually every scene or part in the play relates to these themes. In other words, the purpose of Hamlet is evidently to delineate and comment upon an individuals psychological response to flavour the rare type of obsession that Hamlet feels in the play.. The above themes are phenomena associated with that response, or with Shakespeares model of that response.